Recruit: comparable work samples, not panel theatre
Hiring fails when interviews reward polish over evidence. HIRESDR, HIREAE, and HIRECS freeze the same scenario and must-pass gates so every candidate is scored on the same bar.
Sales hiring seatHiring for SDR / BDR, Account Executive, and CSM seats fails when interviews reward polish over evidence. Deal IQ recruitment aliases (HIRESDR, HIREAE, HIRECS) freeze the same buyer scenario, seniority band, and must-pass gates for every candidate. The win condition is a defensible hire or no-hire call on criterion-referenced behaviour, not a likable conversation. Candidates work Territory through qualification under buyer pressure; managers review fellowship prep, live moves, and debrief scorecards without coaching mid-run. Neutrality is the product truth here: this is evaluation, not enablement for the applicant. Recruiting leaders in Berlin, London, and US enterprise GTM use this stage when legal and RevOps need a work-sample contract that survives scrutiny. Pair the sales hiring seat with the work-sample and structured-assessment guides when you need the full gate language. Do not confuse this room with training: training coaches your employed team; recruit keeps the bar fixed so comparisons stay fair. When you brief TA partners, state the frozen scenario, the seniority band, and which gates are must-pass versus coaching notes after the run. Export the scorecard into your ATS narrative so hiring managers argue from the same artefacts. If a candidate asks for tips mid-scenario, stop the run: coaching during evaluation contaminates the sample and destroys comparability across the slate.


